<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Employee Surveillance—Do You Really Want to Be Big Brother?</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2008/08/20/HR_Policies_and_Procedures_Employee_Surveillance_Pros_Cons_Morale_Work_Life_Balance.aspx</link><description>When it comes to electronic surveillance of employees, as the TV ad says, "Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should."</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Debug Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>re: Employee Surveillance—Do You Really Want to Be Big Brother?</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2008/08/20/HR_Policies_and_Procedures_Employee_Surveillance_Pros_Cons_Morale_Work_Life_Balance.aspx#1072</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:41:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d41f1d89-8bcd-45c6-82d9-dc5c7ed081a0:1072</guid><dc:creator>Karen Groupe</dc:creator><description>I agree that some form of monitoring for business protection is prudent/necessary, but, sadly, the monitoring here stops at the management level. &amp;nbsp;Line staff moral is at a low because they can walk by a manager's desk and see them shopping on ebay</description></item></channel></rss>