<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Invoking the Slippery 'Affirmative Defense' to Harassment</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2009/03/03/Harassment_Lawsuits_Safe_Haven_Affirmative_Defense_Obligations_Supervisor.aspx</link><description>Yesterday's Advisor covered the first three conditions that must be met to invoke an "affirmative defense" against harassment claims. Today we move on to the fourth condition, and bring you news about a unique tool that helps smaller HR departments with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Debug Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>re: Invoking the Slippery 'Affirmative Defense' to Harassment</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2009/03/03/Harassment_Lawsuits_Safe_Haven_Affirmative_Defense_Obligations_Supervisor.aspx#1315</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d41f1d89-8bcd-45c6-82d9-dc5c7ed081a0:1315</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Pokorny</dc:creator><description>This was a very concise analysis of the affirmative defense. &amp;nbsp;I appreciate it.</description></item></channel></rss>