<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>'Victory' in Court Is Always a Little Bitter</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2009/06/24/HR_Policies_Procedures_Giving_References_Requests.aspx</link><description>In employment law cases, "Victory in court is always a little bitter when the costs of achieving it are factored in," says attorney Russell Adler. He was referring in particular to the potential dangers of giving references.

</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Debug Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>re: 'Victory' in Court Is Always a Little Bitter</title><link>http://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/archive/2009/06/24/HR_Policies_Procedures_Giving_References_Requests.aspx#1434</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:53:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d41f1d89-8bcd-45c6-82d9-dc5c7ed081a0:1434</guid><dc:creator>Bob Wignall</dc:creator><description>It is understandable to use a cautious approach on references. However, in my training, I recommend:

1. Use of the "qualified privileged" concept - as long as the information is factual and given in good faith, most states consider it “qualified privileged”,</description></item></channel></rss>