HR Management & Compliance

Safety Issues for Off-Site Employees

Many workers now perform their tasks at worksites other than those owned or operated by their employers. In these situations, the employer remains primarily responsible for ensuring that employees have safe and healthy workplaces.

In a recent BLR webinar, Adele L. Abrams, Esq., CMSP, of the Law Office of Adele L. Abrams PC, offered some guidance for employers dealing with safety issues relating to off-site employment.

Employers cannot evade responsibilities by having employees perform work at third-party or remote locations, says Abrams. Rather, they must:

  • Provide adequate supervision, to the extent possible.
  • Exercise due diligence and take all measures reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of workers.
  • Inspect each remote worksite in advance, if possible, and advise workers of potential hazards and methods of risk mitigation, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), etc.
  • Be aware of specific requirements for certain tasks, such as diving or confined space entry, that may have requirements for the number of people required to be present and may preclude assigning employees to work alone at remote locations.
  • Abide by regulations that deal specifically with working alone (e.g., communication requirements).

Learn the key differences between the California safety rules and the federal with our brand-new, comprehensive report. 

Improving Off-Site Safety Programs

Abrams urges employers to improve their off-site safety and health programs by:

  • Appointing well-qualified safety and health personnel who have the authority to make site safety and health decisions.
  • Tailoring and updating the off-site safety and health plan to reflect remote site conditions and work practices throughout the life of a project, including coordination with other employers that have a presence at the remote worksite.
  • Quantifying worker exposure levels using appropriate sampling methods.
  • Selecting PPE based on accurate, site-specific job hazard analyses.
  • Evaluating safety and health procedures on an ongoing basis and documenting deficiencies and corrective actions.
  • Planning and practicing emergency response procedures thoroughly so on-site personnel and local responders know how to respond to emergencies.

Safety Programs for Off-Site Work Locations

A company’s responsibilities increase when the company has supervisors at off-site locations who oversee daily conditions and employee actions. Written programs can help delineate responsibilities and issues for safety programs at off-site locations.

Don’t make a costly—and preventable—safety mistake by assuming that Cal/OSHA’s rules are the same as federal OSHA’s: They’re not. Learn the crucial differences with our new report.

To address off-site operations, Abrams says safety programs should include the following:

Policy. The policy should affirm that the goal is prevention of injuries and illnesses at all locations where employees are present, including off-site operations.

Scope. The scope of the policy/program should apply to all employees regardless of location of work assignment. It may address worksites outside the United States in a separate document, as warranted. The scope may also address safety for third parties such as consumers and contractors.

Oversight. The program should address which internal departments and staff have oversight responsibilities for safety at off-site locations.

The safety and health department should be notified of the deployment of personnel to off-site locations as early as possible during the proposal phase of projects so the unique needs of the off-site location can be identified and addressed. Safety representatives may need to visit off-site operations (other than home offices) to:

  • Observe local conditions.
  • Inspect facilities prior to operations.
  • Evaluate operating procedures and determine PPE and other needs.
  • Ensure that contractual terms concerning safety are being satisfied.
  • Coordinate training, supervision, PPE provision, reporting etc. with the host employer.

Extensive Analysis of the Key Differences Between California and Federal Safety Rules

Our exclusive Safety Management & Compliance Report, Cal/OSHA vs. Fed/OSHA: A Comprehensive Guide To the Crucial Differences, extensively reviews the differences between Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA that are most likely to affect employers operating in both jurisdictions.

This guide identifies and discusses—in easy-to-read plain English—the differences between Cal/OSHA’s and federal OSHA’s regulations, as well as differences between the two agencies’ approaches to:

  • Standard structure and applicability
  • The general duty clause
  • Injury and Illness Prevention Programs
  • Recordkeeping and reporting requirements
  • Hazardous chemicals
  • Infectious diseases
  • Permit-required confined spaces
  • Ergonomics
  • Heat-related illness
  • Sanitation
  • Agriculture
  • Code of safe practices
  • Multi-employer worksites
  • Young workers
  • Enforcement practices
  • Required postings
  • Citations
  • Appeals
  • And more!

The Only Guide of Its Kind—Anywhere!

Cal/OSHA vs. Fed/OSHA: A Comprehensive Guide To the Crucial Differences was written by an experienced safety consultant, and we believe it is the only comprehensive resource of its kind out there.

You simply won’t find more complete, thorough coverage of the differences between Cal/OSHA and Fed/OSHA anywhere else.  

It’s like having your own personal California safety expert on call 24/7, at a fraction of the cost.

Stay Up-To-Date, Hassle-Free

Best of all, we’ll send you a brand-new edition each year so you always have the most up-to-date information available.

Don’t delay. Order today and get up to speed on the safety rules—both California and federal—that truly matter to your business. If you’re not 100 percent delighted with it, simply return it to us for a full, no-hassle refund—there’s no risk to you.

Download your free copy of
Training Your New Supervisors: 11 Practical Lessons