HR Management & Compliance

Court Says ‘Failure to Equally Train’ Is Actionable

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals— which covers Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee— recently reaffirmed that failure to train an employee can be an actionable form of discrimination.

Click on the “yesterday’s Advisor” link in the first paragraph to read about the facts in this case.

Courts’ decisions

The trial court dismissed all of Charles Reed’s claims. His retaliation claim failed because none of the HR officials to whom he complained had any role in deciding which jobs were eliminated. His “failure to promote” claim failed because he admittedly wasn’t qualified for a technician 4 job, meeting only 75 percent of the requirements.

His hostile environment claim failed because there were few incidents of harassment and no previous complaints about misconduct. Finally, the trial court ruled that an alleged failure to train an employee doesn’t constitute the kind of “harm” that allows him to sue. Reed appealed.

Ultimately, the 6th Circuit upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit. However, the appeals court made several rulings and statements that are instructive to employers. Specifically, even though Reed hadn’t properly appealed the ruling in which the trial court dismissed his “failure to train” claim, the 6th Circuit addressed it.

Unlike the trial court, the 6th Circuit ruled that “failure to equally train” is actionable. Technician 4 jobs pay more than technician 3 jobs. Thus, Procter & Gamble’s alleged failure to equally train Reed indirectly deprived him of potential compensation. If he hadn’t made the procedural error on appeal, the 6th Circuit would have required a trial on the issue. Reed v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co., 13-5797, 2014 WL 553000 (6th Cir., 2014).


Managing an HR Department of One was recently recognized as one of SHRMStore’s “Great 8” best-selling products. Find out what all the buzz is about.


Training takeaways

In this case, being helpful to some, but not all, employees produced a lawsuit. What a supervisor thought of as merely a good deed (soliciting some employees to work toward promotion) resulted in the punishment of litigation, and—but for a procedural mistake—perhaps a trial and liability.

Virtually all workplaces can produce claims of favoritism when an employee is perceived as receiving better treatment from supervisors. This case shows the importance of equal treatment in all aspects of the work environment and all conditions of employment. Innocent favoritism can be misinterpreted as discrimination, and claims of discrimination can begin well before any actual employment decision is made. Here, the alleged “failure to train” stretched back over 5 years!

Brandon Gearhart is an editor of Kentucky Employment Law Letter. You can reach him at bgearhart@fbtlaw.com.

This case is a wake-up call to training professionals and HR departments everywhere—especially small HR departments, who may already feel overwhelmed with all their responsibilities. If you are feeling concerned about the court’s ruling and looking for assistance in avoiding such lawsuits in your organization, consider BLR’s Managing an HR Department of One. This resource is unique in addressing the special pressures small HR departments face.


Feel as if you’re all alone in HR? Take on a partner—Managing an HR Department of One. Get more information.


Here are some of its features:

  • Explanation of how HR supports organizational goals. This section explains how to probe for what your top management really wants and how to build credibility in your ability to deliver it.
  • Overview of compliance responsibilities through a really useful, 2-page chart of 23 separate laws that HR must comply with. These range from the well-known Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and new healthcare reform legislation, to lesser-known but equally critical rules, such as Executive Order 11246. Also included are examples of federal and state posting requirements. (Proper postings are among the first things a visiting inspector looks for—especially now that the minimum wage has been repeatedly changing.)
  • Training guidelines. No matter the size of your company, expect to conduct training. Some of it is required by law; some of it just makes good business sense. Managing an HR Department of One walks you through how to train efficiently and effectively with a minimum of time and money.
  • Prewritten forms, policies, and checklists. These are enormous work savers! Managing an HR Department of One has 46 such forms, from job applications and background check sheets to performance appraisals and leave requests, in both paper and PDF format.

If you’d like a more complete look at what Managing an HR Department of One covers, view the Table of Contents. Or, better yet, take a look at the entire program. We’ll send it to you for 30 days’ evaluation in your own office with no obligation to buy. Click here, and we’ll be happy to make the arrangements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *