HR Management & Compliance

4 More Flaws of Performance Management

Yesterday’s Advisor reviewed 6 of 10 flaws that can afflict typical performance management systems; today, we present the final four pitfalls to avoid while you’re assessing employees during appraisals.



7. Not Recognizing Star Employee

If an employee is performing well above average, he or she should get the deserved recognition. If every employee is given a "satisfactory" (or equivalent) rating, even if some are going above and beyond expectations, star performers will lose faith that their efforts are being recognized. Managers should understand how important it is to use the system to give appropriate ratings across the full spectrum of options—they should not be trying to avoid tough conversations, and they certainly should not be simply giving everyone the same rating because they don’t (or won’t) have the time to put real thought into it.


Does your performance management system provide you and your employees with effective ways to measure how their jobs—and your company—are faring?
Join us on January 15 for tips on how to optimize performance management, and avoid mistakes that can be difficult to fix at best. Learn More. 


8. Not Being Clear

During a performance appraisal, managers must be clear. This is tougher than it seems; managers often want to soften bad news, which can result in employees not getting the message. Managers may also be vague in explaining expectations, which can lead to miscommunication and other problems later. Give specific recommendations and examples for improvement.

9. Using the System Inconsistently

When different managers or departments are inconsistent in when and how they implement the performance management system, this can set up situations in which employees perceive unfairness or favoritism. This can negatively impact both productivity and morale—and can appear discriminatory in some cases. A related issue is when managers intentionally give ratings that are inaccurate. For example, a manager may inaccurately rank someone highly in order to move them to a new (undeserved) role just to get them out of the department. Another example is falsely ranking someone too low, which can happen if rankings are forced, rushed, or implemented with personal bias.


How can you develop a rapport with your employees so you know what motivates them? Learn how at our live webinar on Optimizing Your Performance Management System: Communication & Follow-Up Strategies for Best Results.


10. System Design or Implementation Failures

Such failures might include:

  • Lack of buy-in from senior managers, which often means they won’t require their teams to use the system properly. Change management is a difficult process and should not be taken lightly. Management buy-in is a key component.
  • Failure to fully assess the best design that meets the needs of the organization. A system that seems to be designed for another company isn’t likely to have much support from those who must use it.
  • Incompatibility or duplication of other systems. Employees and managers alike will be reluctant to use a system if they feel their efforts must be duplicated from other systems still in place. Ideally, the performance management system will be integrated with all related systems, such as employee development programs and other Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS) programs.
  • Lack of a mechanism to elicit feedback and continually improve the system.
  • Failing to designate who is responsible for each component of the implementation and follow-up.

As you can see, many flaws with performance management systems come down to people and implementation. This is an arduous process, and it’s easy to see how even well-meaning organizations can have trouble maximizing the benefits.