Benefits and Compensation, HR Management & Compliance

Trump Takes Aim at ACA on First Day in Office

Following his inauguration Friday, President Trump signed his first round of executive orders, including one directing federal agencies to ease enforcement of some Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirements.

ACA

Trump told the agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation” of provisions that impose fees or other burdens on a range of stakeholders, including individuals and health insurers.

Trump noted in the order that his administration ultimately plans to repeal the ACA; but in the meantime, agencies should take steps to minimize the law’s burdens, he said.

“I think it’s more symbolic than anything else,” said H. Juanita Beecher, of counsel with Fortney & Scott and an editor of Federal Employment Law Insider. “It does send a message but I don’t know that it actually changes anything at this point in time,” she told BLR®.

The document doesn’t mention employers but many employer requirements are written directly into the statute and regulations, and the order notes that agencies can’t change regulations without proper notice-and-comment procedures. This means that employer requirements—from health plan requirements to breaks for breastfeeding mothers—are still in place for now, Beecher said.

The call for flexibility may mostly apply to the U.S. Department for Health and Human Services (HHS) and their ability to offer flexibility to states in how they implement Medicaid, Beecher added.

The executive order is the second effort in recent weeks to begin the process of repealing the ACA. The Senate passed a budget January 12 that, according to House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), represented the first step. The House passed it the following day.

Following that effort, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) wrote a letter to lawmakers commending their efforts and asking for several considerations as the repeal effort moves forward.

Specifically, SHRM said it will continue to advocate for the following initiatives:

  • Maintaining the flexibility and certainty afforded employers under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which is essential to the success of the employer-based system.
  • Repeal of the 40-percent “Cadillac tax” on high-value, employer-sponsored health care benefits.
  • Eliminating requirements on employer-sponsored plans to ensure employers have the flexibility to design benefit plans that meet the unique needs of varying workforces.
  • Allowing employers to adopt innovative strategies to improve health benefit offerings to lower overall U.S. health care costs.

Democrats pushed for details about the repeal during the January 18 confirmation hearing for Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), Trump’s nominee for secretary of HHS. Even Republican Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who said that employers are cutting jobs to afford Obamacare mandates, pressed Price to at least make clear whether the repeal and replacement will happen all at once or in pieces.

Price said that the dismantling and replacement would happen “step by step” but declined to elaborate. “One of the important things we need to convey to the American people is that nobody is interested in pulling the rug out from under anybody,” Price said. “We believe it is absolutely imperative that individuals that have health coverage be able to keep health coverage.”

Price offered few details about what a replacement would look like but did suggest that the states should play a larger role. Trump offered similar sentiments in his executive order.

Price declined to offer a timeline for the repeal or replacement. He will now face the Senate Committee on Finance on January 24.

Kate TornoneKate McGovern Tornone is an editor at BLR. She has almost 10 years’ experience covering a variety of employment law topics and currently writes for HR Daily Advisor and HR.BLR.com. Before coming to BLR, she served as editor of Thompson Information Services’ ADA and FLSA publications, co-authored the Guide to the ADA Amendments Act, and published several special reports. She graduated from The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., with a B.A. in media studies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *