Are they talking about me? Do they understand me? Who knows? My workers speak a dozen languages. I’m making a simple rule– speak English at work or else you’re done here.
What with changing demographics, retention woes, and increased hiring demands, more and more businesses are concerned about dealing with employees whose native language is not English. It’s a natural temptation to say “Everyone has to speak English at work.” But can you put out a blanket mandate like that? You can try, but (a) it won’t work very well, and (b) the courts won’t buy it.
In general, blanket restrictions against using languages other than English won’t be acceptable. It’s best to base restrictions on business necessity; that is, on communication concerns, workplace safety, or productivity.
Let’s divide this question into two issues: hiring and working environment.
English Only–Si. Yes you can have an English-only policy, without discriminating. It’s all laid out in a new March 25 audio conference. Satisfaction is ensured. Click for info
Hiring and Fluency Requirements
As a practical matter, says attorney Sandra Rappaport, English-fluency requirements are usually going have a disparate impact on individuals of some particular national origin. That essentially means that the employer needs to be able to justify a fluency requirement based on some business reason, such as the need to communicate effectively with customers or clients, or for safety.
Rappaport, a partner with Hanson Bridgett in San Francisco, made her comments in a recent issue of California Employment Law Answers.
In administering fluency requirements, she says, be aware that the business need for an English-fluency requirement may not be the same from job to job. Salespeople who deal with an English-speaking public do likely require effective communication in English in order to perform their jobs.
However, your warehouse workers who do not interact with English-speaking customers may not need to speak English perfectly in order to perform their jobs effectively, and to impose an English-fluency requirement on those workers could be found to be discriminatory. However, it may be lawful to require them to speak some English for safety or efficiency reasons.
Baffled by employees’ languages? Wish everyone spoke perfect English? Those days are gone. Find out what to do in the March 25 audio conference: English-Only Policy Perks and Pitfalls: How to Craft a Policy That Works for You – And Avoid Legal Risks. Can’t attend? Preorder the CD. Click for details
English Only During the Workday
Many employers want to adopt rules prohibiting languages other than English at work. Employers should not adopt or enforce any policy that limits or prohibits the use of any language in the workplace at all times, says Rappaport. Align your policy along with business necessity, and do not attempt to control languages used during nonduty time like breaks and mealtimes, she advises.
It’s also important to apply your rules to all foreign languages rather than certain select ones.
Questions from the ‘Red Book’
If you are considering a policy that restricts your workers’ languages, answer the following questions taken from BLR’s famous “Red Book.”
EEOC Guidelines for English-Only Policies
Finally, in judging your situation, consider these examples issued by EEOC of business necessity that would justify an English-only policy:
In the next issue of the Advisor, we will discuss implementing an English-only policy and introduce an up-to-the-minute audio conference that will answer all your English-only questions.