Measuring HR success to the satisfaction of the CEO remains an elusive goal. Bottom line: You want funding, and they want metrics. Today’s expert has practical help for metrics that are failing to make an impression in the C-suite.
Metrics guru Dr. John Sullivan says that human resources managers make two key mistakes when using metrics to measure HR’s accomplishments. Sullivan is a metrics consultant and professor of management at San Francisco State University.
Metrics in a Vacuum
The first mistake, says Sullivan, blogging on www.ere.net, is that HR managers tend to develop and implement HR metrics in a vacuum. By “in a vacuum” Sullivan means doing metrics development wholly within the HR function. That gives you metrics that HR likes, but not necessarily those that management likes. He recommends that employers take a collaborative approach. Take a list of your strategic HR metrics into the CFO’s office and let him or her help you select the best ones.
Ask these questions: Which are easy to understand, which appear to measure business impact, and which will appeal to top management? By involving the CFO, you’ll not only pick good metrics but also end up with a high-level champion who can remove a lot of roadblocks.
Need funding for HR? Let metrics tell management about your contributions. Learn which to use, and how to calculate them. BLR’s 90-minute July 16 webinar gets you up to speed. Read more
Too Many Metrics
The second mistake is that managers develop too many metrics and then get bogged down in tracking and interpreting them all. Figure out which ones really matter, he says, and which ones really demonstrate HR’s impact on the business.
First Tier Metrics
Sullivan offers these “first tier” metrics suggestions for six areas of interest:
–Overall workforce productivity. Measure the percentage improvement in workforce productivity (people costs divided by revenue, then compared to prior years) and also the dollar value of the change.
–Employee engagement. From survey data, calculate the percentage of employees who “look forward to coming to work every day.” (You have to balance engagement against productivity, or your people will burn out and leave, Sullivan notes.)
Heading up to the C-suite? Be ready to speak management’s language. Attend BLR’s in-depth HR Metrics webinar on July 16. Can’t attend? Preorder the CD. For info, to register, or to preorder the CD, click here
–Satisfaction with management. Report the percentage of employees who believe that their bosses exercise expected management behaviors (for example, communication, recognition, offering opportunities for growth and learning, making work challenging and exciting, and showing employees that their work makes a difference).
–Recruiting. These metrics are helpful for evaluating recruiting, Sullivan says:
–Number of days positions are vacant
–Managerial satisfaction with new hires
–Turnover rate of new hires
–Percentage of diversity hires at all levels
–Dollar impact of a bad hire in a key position
Retention. Sullivan also recommends several metrics for measuring retention:
–Performance turnover in key jobs
–Preventable turnover
–Diversity turnover
–Dollar impact of turnover
–Managers’ satisfaction with HR and retention
Overall HR costs. Finally, says Sullivan, include a measure of HR costs, such as HR cost per employee.
In tomorrow’s Advisor, we’ll look at a Sullivan’s second tier metrics and tell you about an upcoming webinar designed to answer your key metrics questions.
Another common mistake when metrics are established, is not to establish a goal: what are we going to do with the result? Without it, again companies will use them in the vacuum Dr. John Sullivan is quoted to mention in this article.
The “quality of hire” metric is an interesting discussion topic. For the service sector, many of our professional positions are difficult to measure using traditional productivity gains, revenue per employee, etc. That difficulty is compounded when you move to the non-profit and Government sectors.
I’ve seen approaches to measuring quality of hire ranging from basic surveys to mangers, to a composite score of performance ratings, awards, & pay increases.
Does anyone have any other examples or templates for measuring “quality of hire”?