Faced with a firing, managers are typically upset and uncomfortable. They want to just “get it over with.” Stop right there. Slow them down, and ask these 10 questions first. Otherwise, you’re likely headed for an expensive lawsuit.
Here are the 10 questions BLR® experts recommend you ask before any termination. If your answer to any of these questions rings a worrisome note, review the situation carefully before making a termination decision.
1. Have you followed your own policies?
Most organizations have a discipline policy that covers termination. Check your policy to be sure that you have followed it, especially if your policy calls for “progressive discipline” or suggests that employees are fired only for cause.
Policies generally reserve the right to skip steps in the progressive discipline system and fire immediately for certain offenses such as stealing or violence. However, you should exercise this right with caution.
2. Is there a contract or other guarantee?
If the employee in question has a written employment contract, you will probably be bound by its terms. Even in the absence of written contracts, many courts have found that certain documents, such as employee handbooks or offer letters, can create implied employment contracts. For example, your policy or handbook might inadvertently:
- “Guarantee” a job as long as work is satisfactory.
- Require arbitration or other alternate dispute resolution approaches.
- Mandate progressive discipline.
The solution to shrinking HR budgets—Take a no-cost, no-obligation look at HR.BLR.com® and get a complimentary copy of our special report Critical HR Recordkeeping. It’s yours to keep, no matter what you decide. Learn more.
3. Is there a union agreement?
If the employee in question is covered by a union contract, you must determine whether this termination would be contrary to union contract provisions.
Furthermore, if the employee has been involved in union organizing, you must weigh whether the offense for which the employee is to be terminated could be considered “concerted activity” or whether the termination could be considered retaliation for union activity.
4. Have you been consistent?
Consistency is an important part of fair treatment. If you have consistently terminated others for the same offense for which you want to terminate this employee, you are probably going to be all right. If, however, you have never terminated a white male for a certain offense, and now you intend to terminate a black male for that offense, you could be on thin ice.
5. Could this firing be viewed as discriminatory?
Could the employee claim that he or she was fired not for the reason the organization claims, but because of discrimination? (“You fired me because I am [old, black, Muslim, gay, disabled, etc.], not because I broke a rule.”)
Finally—a one-stop solution to all your HR compliance and training needs. Examine HR.BLR.com and get a complimentary gift. Here’s how.
6. Could this firing be viewed as retaliatory?
Could the employee claim that he or she was fired for performing a protected activity? For example, making a complaint to a government agency, making accusations of sexual harassment, or making a workers’ compensation claim? If so, look at the situation carefully.
7. Is the employee pregnant?
In general, treat pregnant women the same way you treat any employee with a disability. You may not fire a woman because she is pregnant.
In the next issue of the Advisor, we will cover questions 8 through 10 and look at a terminations checklist from HR.BLR.com.
Other Recent Articles on HR Policies and Procedures
Effective Wellness Means Branding, Integration
Corporate Wellness—Real World ROI of 4 Plus 5
Monitoring the Use of Electronics? Privacy Alert!
Psst! I’ll Show You How to Work Around that Policy
“4. Have you been consistent?
Consistency is an important part of fair treatment. If you have consistently terminated others for the same offense for which you want to terminate this employee, you are probably going to be all right. If, however, you have never terminated a white male for a certain offense, and now you intend to terminate a black male for that offense, you could be on thin ice.”
Are you FREAKING kidding me? This site is actually condoning making administrative decisions based on the RACE of the individual involved? So, if a black woman shows up to work, slaps a co-worker, steals from the petty cash (and is caught doing so on a security camera), and flashes her genitalia at customers, and I have not fired a white male for any of those offenses, I should seriously consider whether or not I will fire her for it? This kind of racial over-sensitivity borders on reverse racism, and promotes inequality. You people suck.