Training is often perceived as a soft science. But to train better and to get more funding for training, consider doing it “by the numbers.”
These days, business is increasingly ruled by numbers. But there are some things that can’t be quantified, right? Like how the human mind can be affected by training.
Not so, says training industry leader Bob Pike, speaking at a meeting of the American Society for Training & Development (ASTD). Pike started his address by flatly stating that, no, not every problem can be solved by training.
“Coaching, systems changes and recruiting,” are also solutions to performance problems, says Pike.
But when training is the answer, Pike suggested two formulas trainers should keep in mind:
1. The 90/20/8 Rule. Pike explained that trainers generally believe that a given audience can listen with understanding for 90 minutes, but that they only retain 20 minutes of the information presented.
Those two factors are then dependent on a third: The trainee must be personally involved in the training every 8 minutes. Use visual and verbal stimulation, make the training relevant, and let people network with each other and you’ll keep them involved, Pike says.
Everything California employers need to know about training and more — an invaluable desk reference you shouldn’t be without.
2. The Ebbinghaus Curve. Pike also explained that how fast trainees forget things they’ve learned has also been plotted. The first work in this area was published by a German psychologist, Hermann Ebbinghaus, in 1885, who explored the human rate of forgetfulness by memorizing nonsense words, then methodically testing himself over time as to how much he remembered.
As explained by Pike, a trainee can remember 90 percent of what they’ve learned after an hour, 50 percent after a day, 25 percent after 2 days, and only 10 percent after 30 days.
That’s the reason additional reinforcement training needs to be done, Pike maintained. Subject matter needs to be revisited 6 times before it’s truly learned. Importantly, he added, the more relevant the subject matter, the greater the retention.
Calculating Training’s Cost vs. Training’s Benefits
Another valuable way to quantify training is by calculating a Return on Investment (ROI) analysis that can be used to sell management on spending the money for training, and that after the training is done, can measure its effectiveness in top management’s favorite language: dollars and cents. Here’s how it works:
The one-stop easy-reference guide to all things California employment law — check it out today, 100% risk-free.
First, quantify the costs of the training, including materials, instructor fees, facilities rental, lost productivity while workers are training, and administrative costs.
Next, quantify the monetary benefits from the training, including labor savings, productivity increase, new revenue, and lower turnover costs.
Finally, apply these numbers in this formula:
ROI % = Monetary benefits — Training Costs x 100 / Training Costs
An example: Say training increases production by 20%, equal to $800,000 in new revenue, against a $200,000 total training cost. If so, then $800,000 – $200,000 x 100/$200,000 = an ROI of 300%, or $3 back for every $1 spent.
Bring in results like that from training and, with deference to Professor Ebbinghaus, your management won’t soon forget it.
Download your free copy of Training Your New Supervisors: 11 Practical Lessons today!
Seems like there’s an analogy here with HR: another “soft science” that can actually be quantified quite accurately with the right metrics. What do you all think?
Seems like there’s an analogy here with HR: another “soft science” that can actually be quantified quite accurately with the right metrics. What do you all think?