Here are three more of Erdle’s six compensation mistakes. (Erdle is founder of Erdle Compensation Consulting, www.erdleconsulting.net.)
[Go here for mistakes 1, 2, and 3]
4. Rewarding Hard Work
Typically, you’re not trying to reward hard work, Erdle says; you’re trying to reward an outcome. The reason? Employees can work hard and still not get the job done. “I did a project for a biotech company. They were getting ready for an audit by the FDA, and people were in there all night working. You’d see them during the day, bags under their eyes.
“One of the VPs told me that they like to reward employees for their hard work. I asked him what kind of behavior they were rewarding. ‘You’re rewarding people for working hard and not necessarily for getting the job done,’ I told him. So that’s the behavior they got. I tell clients not to reward based on working hard. If employees can get the job done quickly and efficiently, reward for that.”
5. Averaging Data
What if the pay rates for different data selections aren’t similar? Erdle says that one mistake he often sees is averaging these figures. “Averaging them doesn’t give you an accurate picture,” he says. Each data selection needs to be evaluated in reference to the job you are looking at, and then a decision is made about market competitiveness. Depending on the job, one data selection may be more important to consider than another.
“Even if you did average them, wouldn’t you want to do a weighted average based on the number of incumbents in each data selection instead of just a simple average?” he muses. Aside from the data selections to consider, you will want to ensure you have a large enough sample size, and you would want to analyze other statistics such as the median and salary range midpoint. The median is a much better statistic to use than the average when sample sizes are relatively small, but most people simply average everything, thinking they are doing the right thing.
Hard to get to real data and meaningful comp comparisons? Good news, now there’s Compensation Analyzer to help you compare your pay systems to those of other employers in your industry and region. Find out more about the Compensation Analyzer.
6. Overcomplicating Your Comp System!
Remember that employees won’t respond to a program they don’t understand. Erdle recommends that your compensation system be simple, without a lot of complicated bells and extraneous whistles. “You need to have a system that is simple enough to understand … and to explain,” he says. “I find that complicated systems just don’t work that well. I like to do things that are straightforward and simple.
“This stuff isn’t rocket science at all. You need something that you can explain to managers, and have managers explain to their employees. Once the program is up and running, you’re going to have employees coming in waving some internet survey they found and threatening to leave if they don’t get a pay raise. Make sure you have something explainable so you can stand behind it. It makes sense for everyone.”
Comp—it’s never easy, but now it’s more manageable than ever:
Announcing a Major Advance in Compensation Management!
Compensation.BLR.com now includes a brand new management tool —Compensation Analyzer—that compares your organization’s pay scales, grades, and salary offers against those of other employers. Plus you get instant access to built-in job descriptions, industrial classifications, geographic comparisons, employer size variables, and much more.
The BLR Compensation Analyzer delivers the hard numbers you need to retain top talent, make smart and defensible decisions, and control payroll expenses.
- Evaluates your pay rates to ensure they are competitive
- Compares your pay scales, grades, and salary offers against those of other employers
- Benchmarks your jobs to BLR survey data to see how they compare in different demographic slices (industry, employer size, geography)
- Automatically computes ratios, such as compa-ratios and penetration ratios
- Sorts and filters salary data just the way you want it
- Identifies flight risks and provides the data to support the assessment
- Exports data to your documents and spreadsheets for formatting and reporting
- Adds data from other surveys and use to compare in a single, easy-to-use report
Plus with Compensation.BLR.com you can:
- Price jobs with the Salary Finder
- Manage and create job descriptions
- Calculate turnover cost
- Access all services 24/7 from any computer, anywhere in the world
- Keep up with constantly changing compensation and benefits best practices
The Compensation Analyzer was designed for easy startup. Add your job titles, rate ranges, and departments via a simple interface.
The Compensation Analyzer produces reports to back up every decision. Compare employee pay to rate ranges, BLR survey data, benchmarked jobs, and external surveys
Is your compensation system managing you? Check out BLR’s new Compensation Analyzer to see how you can get back in control. Find out more about the Compensation Analyzer.
Is My Employee Salary and Other Data Secure?
“Is the data secure?” is the first question compensation managers ask in evaluating a comp management system. Yes, data you enter into the BLR Compensation Analyzer is fully secure. We use SSL (Secure Socket Layer) to encrypt information passing between your computer and our server which stops unauthorized access. Your access is protected via a unique username and password, so there’s no chance that another party will be able to see it.
Have a question or need help?
Email us at CompAnalyzer@BLR.com or call 1-800-727-5257.
Ask for a “Compensation Analyzer Consultant.”
“Typically, you’re not trying to reward hard work, Erdle says; you’re trying to reward an outcome. The reason? Employees can work hard and still not get the job done.” This is a common issue. I used to work at a bar association where one of the directors was highly paid because the members she worked with always knew she was in the office late at night and on weekends. But that was because she was an incredibly inefficient worker who wasted tons of time. Her outcomes weren’t any better than those of her predecessor, who made significantly less money.