HR Management & Compliance

Please Sue Me—2014 edition

Popular SHRM speaker Hunter Lott (hunterlott.com) opened his always-well-attended Please Sue Me 2014 presentation with the usual list of “Please Sue Me’s.”

Lott’s comments came at the recent SHRM Annual Conference and Exhibition in Orlando. Some of his “Please Sue Me’s”:

‘Distressed Babies’ Comment Draws Apology from AOL Chief

AOL’s CEO defended a policy change (awarding 401(k) matches annually instead of monthly) that he said was needed to counterbalance healthcare expenses such as those caused by two pregnancies where “distressed” babies incurred more than $1 million each in medical expenses. An employee uproar caused him to reverse the policy.
Please sue me, says Lott.

JPMorgan Chase Will Pay $1,450,000 to Resolve EEOC Class Sex Discrimination Lawsuit

[From an EEOC Press Release]

Female mortgage bankers in Columbus, Ohio, were subjected to sex-based harassment and denied lucrative sales opportunities, the EEOC charged.
Please sue me, says Lott.

Dynamic Medical Services to Pay $170,000 to Settle EEOC Religious Discrimination Lawsuit

[From an EEOC Press Release]

The EEOC charged in its suit that Dynamic Medical Services, Inc. (DMS) required some employees to spend at least half their workdays in courses that involved Scientology religious practices, such as screaming at ashtrays, staring at someone for 8 hours without moving, and attending courses at the Church of Scientology.

According to EEOC’s suit, employees repeatedly asked not to attend the courses but were told it was a requirement of the job. In two cases, when employees refused, they were terminated.
Please sue me, says Lott.


Active shooter—are you ready? Get ready on September 11, 2014, with a new interactive webinar Active Shooter in the Workplace: How to Effectively Respond with a Survivor’s Mindset & Reduce the Risk of Devastating Consequences. Learn More


Pitre Car Dealership to Pay over $2 Million to Resolve EEOC Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Suit

[From an EEOC Press Release]

The Albuquerque firm’s management directed and encouraged the abuse of over 50 male employees for more than a decade, the EEOC charged.
Please sue me, says Lott.

In all these cases there might have been an HR manager saying you can’t, you can’t, you can’t. It’s better, says Lott, to talk to management about risk vs. reward vs. exposure. Instead of saying, “You can’t,” talk about dollars, morale, and negative publicity.

Employee Tenure Is Not Dropping

There’s a perception that employee tenure, that is, how long people stay at a job, has been dropping, but that’s not actually true, says Lott. Today’s average tenure is 4.6 years, while the figure from 30 years ago, 1983, is 3.6 years, according to the BLS.

Perspective

One way to slow managers down is to tell them to imagine their actions on “60 Minutes” or celebrity news website “TMZ.” Would the manager feel OK with this action, policy, or procedure featured in one of these places?

The Tough Question About New Hires

Lott suggests that managers address this question:  Are we a destination company for “A” players? Or turn it around—why would an A player come to work for us?  What does the answer mean for your hiring? If you’re not an A and wish you were, what could you be doing to improve the situation?

The Tough Question About Incumbents

Then, says Lott, ask this question about your current employees: Do we have A players working for us now? A helpful way to assess this is to ask another question about each of your employees, says Lott: Would you enthusiastically rehire this employee? If not, why not and what are you doing about it?


Active shooter? You must have a plan. Join us September 11 for a new interactive webinar, Active Shooter in the Workplace: How to Effectively Respond with a Survivor’s Mindset & Reduce the Risk of Devastating Consequences. Earn 1.5 hours in HRCI Recertification Credit. Register Now


Be Consistent … AND … Make Exceptions!

Consistency is important but it is not always the best policy, says Lott. It is the easy way out. For example, it’s consistent to give everyone the same percentage raise and the same bonus. But do you really want to treat your good and bad people the same? These are the times to be inconsistent for exceptional people, Lott says.

In tomorrow’s Advisor, more of Lott’s tips, plus we announce an important new webinar: “Active Shooter in the Workplace.”

1 thought on “Please Sue Me—2014 edition”

  1. I disagree with Mr Lott’s assertion that exceptions are fine. I think that practice can lead a company down the wrong road.

    I do agree that we don’t want to give every employee the same bonus / annual increase. You need to build an objective merit program which you follow consistently to best reward your star performers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *