Benefits and Compensation

Pay-for-Performance—Is Management Willing?

Pay-for-Performance is the hot new approach to compensation, says expert Brooke Green; however, you shouldn’t attempt it if management isn’t willing to do its job in performance evaluation.

Green, who is a principal at Hay Group, offered her tips at a recent webinar sponsored by HRHero/BLR. In yesterday’s Advisor, she suggested that HR managers ask three key questions before launching a pay-for-performance program. [Go here for Question 1]

Question 2. Is Management Willing to Differentiate?

At the heart of pay-for-performance is paying higher performers more. The pay difference between mediocre and exceptional performance must be meaningful enough to change employee behavior.

To make that possible, pay increases and incentives must be withheld from poor performers and reduced for good performers, and for many managers, that’s not easy.

The typical differential between regular performers and stars is 1.5 times or less (reported by 68 percent of companies in a recent Hay Group survey). Best practice is to maintain at least a 2 times differential, Green says.

That is, for example, top performers get a 6 percent raise versus a 3 percent raise for other employees—that means something.

Five Principles for Differentiated Rewards

Consider the following five principles for establishing a system of differentiated rewards, Green says.

  • Focus program design. Don’t pay for the same thing twice. (Once in the merit increase and again in the incentive pay)
  • Set clear performance-reward linkages. Make it clear what an individual has to do to affect company results.
  • Remember the “management” in performance management.
  • Secure funding and differentiate rewards
  • Communicate, communicate, communicate

Find problems before the feds do. HR Audit Checklists ensures that you have a chance to fix problems before government agents or employees’ attorneys get a chance. Try the program at no cost or risk.


Question 3: Are Employees Skeptical?

If employees don’t have faith in system, it won’t motivate. Some of the reasons for the skepticism that Green hears from employees:

  • Limitations of merit pay (Too much of the budget is consumed by cost-of-living and equity adjustments)
  • Overlapping objectives
    • Paying multiple times for the same outcomes (if you are using the same criteria for merit pay and bonus, then you’re paying twice for the same work—that’s not optimal, Green says)
    • Lack of clarity around objectives and measures
  • Inadequate differentiation of performance
    • Performance ratings tend to skew up
    • Many managers and supervisors lack the will or the know how to properly evaluate performance
  • Inadequate differentiation of rewards
    • Many managers settle for mediocrity than make waves in their departments ( I’ll give everyone a little something.)
    • Many lack courage to provide lower performers with lower pay
  • Misalignment of effort and resources
    • Disconnect between Reward ROI and administration energy

Pay-for-performance, wage and hour, new rules, retention, equity—a few of, what, a dozen policy issues you’re dealing with today? How can you be sure your systems are operating according to policy? There’s only one way—regular audits. The rub is that for most HR managers, it’s hard to get started auditing—where do you begin?

BLR’s editors recommend a unique product called HR Audit Checklists. Why are checklists so great? Because they’re completely impersonal, forcing you to jump through all the necessary hoops one by one. They also ensure consistency in how operations are conducted. That’s vital in HR, where it’s all too easy to land in court if you discriminate in how you treat one employee over another.


Using the “hope” system to avoid lawsuits? (We “hope” we’re doing it right.) Be sure! Check out every facet of your HR program with BLR’s unique checklist-based audit program. Click here to try HR Audit Checklists on us for 30 days.

HR Audit Checklists compels thoroughness. For example, it contains checklists both on Preventing Sexual Harassment and on Handling Sexual Harassment Complaints. You’d likely never think of all the possible trouble areas without a checklist; but with it, just scan down the list, and instantly see where you might get tripped up.

In fact, housed in the HR Audit Checklists binder are dozens of extensive lists, organized into reproducible packets, for easy distribution to line managers and supervisors. There’s a separate packet for each of the following areas:

  • Staffing and training (incorporating Equal Employment Opportunity in recruiting and hiring, including immigration issues)
  • HR administration (including communications, handbook content, and recordkeeping)
  • Health and safety (including OSHA responsibilities)
  • Benefits and leave (including health cost containment, COBRA, FMLA, workers’ compensation, and several areas of leave)
  • Compensation (payroll and the Fair Labor Standards Act)
  • Performance and termination (appraisals, discipline, and termination)

HR Audit Checklists is available to HR Daily Advisor readers for a no-cost, no-risk evaluation in your office for up to 30 days. Visit HR Audit Checklists, and we’ll be happy to arrange it.

1 thought on “Pay-for-Performance—Is Management Willing?”

  1. In addition to “is management willing to differentiate,” I think you have to ask if management is capable of differentiating, or at least of doing so fairly. Training will likely be necessary.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *