The current global economic environment means executives are thinking about reward program management in new ways, says consultant Tom McMullen. The good news is that Hay Group studies show human capital concerns rank number one.
What’s the Deal with the ‘Regular Rate’?
FThe bad news is that many organizations still find it hard to maintain an effective rewards system.
McMullen is Reward Practice Leader for Hay Group in Chicago. He was joined by Dow Scott, professor of Human Resources in the Quinlan School of Business Administration at Loyola University Chicago and president of Performance Development International, a management consulting firm. Their remarks came at the WorldatWork conference in Philadelphia.
What Is the C-suite Concerned About?
Here are the dominant C-suite reward-related themes, according to McMullen:
- Optimizing productivity and cost effectiveness
- Improving employee engagement
- Developing and retaining key talent
- Improving performance management processes
- Aligning human capital and reward systems to business strategy
Major Challenges with Reward Practices Today
McMullen finds the following common challenges for employers that are trying to implement meaningful reward strategies:
- Strategy and design
- There’s little input from employees on reward strategy and design.
- Awards often are not aligned with strategy.
- There is often an extreme focus on benchmarking and little concern given to affordability of pay programs.
- Reward components are managed in isolation of each other.
- Implementation
- Performance management processes are often weak (it’s hard to separate out top performers).
- The value and intent of “total rewards” are not understood by employees.
- Line managers are not well engaged in reward implementation.
- Little is done in terms of reward ROI assessment.
2013 Reward Next Practices Survey
To find out how companies are meeting these challenges, WorldatWork conducted a survey in early 2013 of 303 senior reward professionals to identify key characteristics of reward strategies and programs.
Talent Pool? Sure, build it with recruiting, social media, employer brand. Find 10 best practices. Attend BLR’s interactive webinar, 10 Strategies for Building a Talent Pool that Makes Recruiting Easy. Join us November 13, 2013. Learn More
Is Reward a Cost or an Investment?
The survey asked whether the organization regularly measures the ROI on its reward investment. Eleven percent of respondents said this is a current focus, and 48% said it will get greater focus in the future.
It’s an important question, McMullen says, because of this:
If pay is a cost, the obvious goal is to minimize it.
If pay is an investment, the obvious goal is to optimize it.
If reward is viewed as an investment, organizations focus on:
- Aligning rewards with its business and human capital strategy
- Balancing employee and organization reward interests
- Reinforcing the link between rewards and performance
- Distilling down and sustaining key reward communications
- Leveraging senior leaders, managers, and employees in reward implementation
Core Reward Strategy Objectives
There is an increased emphasis on the motivational value of reward programs, says McMullen. As the survey table shows, employers will focus on the motivational value in the future.
Reward program is … |
% saying this is a current focus |
% saying this will be a greater focus in future |
Externally competitive |
64% |
53% |
Internally fair |
75% |
41% |
Motivational |
39% |
67% |
Reasonable in cost |
74% |
47% |
Reward Strategy Trends
McMullen sees the following trends affecting reward strategy:
FROM |
|
TO |
Externally competitive |
► |
Motivational |
Inconsistent |
► |
Consistent |
Short-term performance orientation |
► |
Longer-term performance orientation |
Financial performance measures |
► |
Balanced performance measures |
Cost orientation of reward |
► |
ROI orientation of reward |
Core Compensation Program Effectiveness
The survey shows an across-the-board focus on increasing compensation effectiveness, says Scott.
Rewards |
% saying this is a current focus |
% saying this will be a greater focus in future |
Base cash/wage programs |
74% |
44% |
Short-term variable pay |
47% |
56% |
Long-term variable pay |
34% |
42% |
Financial recognition programs |
32% |
38% |
Total Remuneration (i.e., mix of fixed, variable, and benefits) |
62% |
61% |
Compensation Process Effectiveness
Survey participants indicated that performance management is the primary focus in the future, Scott says.
Compensation |
% saying this is a current focus |
% saying this will be a greater focus in future |
Market pricing |
62% |
50% |
Job leveling/grading |
51% |
53% |
Performance |
41% |
69% |
Recruiting and Retention woes? Build a talent pool. Attend BLR’s timely new webcast—10 Strategies for Building a Talent Pool that Makes Recruiting Easy. In just 90 minutes, you’ll learn how to build a talent pool that makes recruiting easy. Register today
Nonfinancial Reward Program Effectiveness
Career development opportunities will be a primary focus in the future for many survey participants, says McMullen.
Nonfinancial Reward |
% saying this is a current focus |
% saying this will be a greater focus in future |
Education and training programs |
50% |
54% |
Career/development opportunities |
39% |
63% |
Flexible work arrangements |
50% |
32% |
Nonfinancial recognition |
38% |
43% |
Work climate/culture |
57% |
48% |
Work/life balance |
48% |
38% |
Meaningful job design |
37% |
31% |
Reward Design Trends
McMullen sees the following design trends for rewards programs:
FROM |
|
TO |
Base pay program management |
► |
Variable pay program management |
Paying for jobs/work |
► |
Focus on paying for value/contribution |
Flexible work arrangements |
► |
Career development, culture, recognition |
Defined benefit plans |
► |
Defined contribution plans |
Siloed reward element orientation |
► |
Total remuneration / rewards orientation |
In tomorrow’s Advisor, more on compensation design from McMullen and Scott, plus good news about an upcoming webinar that shows how to build a talent pool to make hiring A-level talent easier.