Benefits and Compensation

Expert Reveals Variable Pay Program ‘Framework’

In yesterday’s Advisor, we discussed why merit programs don’t work according to consultant John Rubino. Today, his take on variable and step-based pay systems.

John A. Rubino, who is the founder and president of Rubino Consulting

Services in Pound Ridge, New York, offered his tips at a recent BLR®-sponsored webinar.

 

Rubino’s Variable Pay Program ‘Framework’

PERFORMANCE WEIGHTINGS
Tier Target Opportunity Range

0 to 150% of Target

Corp. Dept. Indiv.
1 – Officers 35.0% 0 – 52.5% 70% 20% 10%
2 – Directors 25.0% 0 – 37.5% 40% 50% 10%
3 – Managers 15.0% 0 – 22.5% 30% 50% 20%
4 – Profess. 10.0% 0 – 15.0% 20% 20% 60%
5 – Support 8.0% 0 – 12.0% 10% 20% 70%

The target opportunity of performance is what the person would receive as a percent of his or her base salary if all goals are achieved.

Rubino suggests 8 percent as the minimum, and he doesn’t like to go below 5 percent. That’s not substantial enough for him. However, amounts do have to be based on market data and what you can afford, he adds.

The range of potential awards includes a 150 percent upside and, of course, a downside of zero.

Then there is a weighting of three types: corporate (we all share in corporate performance), departmental, and individual. As can be seen from the table, the officer level is 70 percent based on corporate and only 10 percent on individual, whereas  down at tier 5, 70 percent is based on individual goals, but the person still shares in the corporate goals.

These weights need to be talked about and aligned to your organization, says Rubino. For example, you may want to add a team column. There are many ways to slice this cheese, he says.


HR budget cuts? Let us help. HR.BLR.com is your one-stop solution for all your HR compliance and training needs. Take a no-cost, no-obligation trial and get a complimentary copy of our special report Critical HR Recordkeeping—From Hiring to Termination. It’s yours—no matter what you decide.

What About Step-Based Pay?

Step-based pay (under which employees get set raises every year in established amounts) is highly organized and very strict, says Rubino.

Rubino’s 5 Top Reasons for Implementing a Step-Based System

1. Strict management and administration of compensation expenses (if control of expenses is very important).
2. Majority of jobs are routine and task-oriented (rote), doing the same thing every day.
3. Performance/skill variation levels of most jobs are minimal—in other words, it’s difficult to tell the difference between someone doing extremely well and average. Often these jobs are either you do it or you don’t do it, says Rubino.
4. Management cannot make appropriate distinctions among employee performance/skill levels for most jobs.
5. Use of alternative reward vehicles, such as comprehensive variable pay, is available.

You often see this kind of structure in a union contract, for example, says Rubino. A 5-year contract may call for $X the first year, then have defined increases for the next 4 years. Of course, he adds, you can build this whether you are unionized or not.

Disadvantages of Step-Based Pay

Disadvantages of step-based pay are obvious, says Rubino. All you have to do is breathe and be there every day, and you will get your step rate increase. Performance beyond meeting minimum standards is not considered.

The most important consideration for comp managers is to be sure that the system is market-based.

Step-based plus variable? Merit? Compensation and benefits are never as easy as you wish they were. Even the most basic challenge—wage and hour—should be simple, but it’s just not. Complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is one of the most confusing and challenging things comp pros have to do.

From hiring sales managers to dealing with the C-suite to routine discipline and documentation, HR never sleeps. You need a go-to resource, and our editors recommend the “everything-HR-in-one” website, HR.BLR.com®. As an example of what you will find, here are some policy recommendations concerning e-mail, excerpted from a sample policy on the website:

• Privacy. The director of information services can override any individual password and, therefore, has access to all e-mail messages in order to ensure compliance with company policy. This means that employees do not have an expectation of privacy in their company e-mail or any other information stored or accessed on company computers.
• E-mail review. All e-mail is subject to review by management. Your use of the e-mail system grants consent to the review of any of the messages to or from you in the system in printed form or in any other medium.
• Solicitation. In line with our general policy, e-mail must not be used to solicit for outside business ventures, personal parties, social meetings, charities, membership in any organization, political causes, religious causes, or other matters not connected to the company’s business.
We should point out that this is just one of hundreds of sample policies on the site. (You’ll also find analyses of all the HR-related laws and the current critical issues, plus downloadable job descriptions, and complete training materials for hundreds of HR topics.)

You can examine the entire HR.BLR.com® program free of any cost or commitment. It’s quite remarkable—30 years of accumulated HR knowledge, tools, and skills gathered in one place and accessible at the click of a mouse.

What’s more, we’ll supply a free, downloadable copy of our special report, Critical HR Recordkeeping—From Hiring to Termination, just for looking at HR.BLR.com. If you’d like to try it at absolutely no cost or obligation to continue (and get the special report, no matter what you decide), go here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *