A study of “cognitive flexibility,” the scientific term for multitasking, done by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and at two German universities, may shed some light on what makes someone better at switching between different tasks. The study also explains that difficulties with multitasking might be caused by certain mental disorders.
The researchers’ goal was to determine a fundamental understanding of how the brain manages multitasking, which could lead to better interventions for medical conditions associated with reduced executive function, such as autism, schizophrenia, and dementia.
According to a press release, by studying networks of activity in the brain’s frontal cortex, a region associated with control over thoughts and actions, the researchers have shown that the degree to which these networks reconfigure themselves while switching from task to task predicts people’s cognitive flexibility.
Experiment participants who performed best while alternating between a memory test and a control test showed the most rearrangement of connections within their frontal cortices, as well as the most new connections with other areas of their brains.
Unlimited employee HR training—one low cost, no setup, no software to install. Find out why the Software & Information Industry Association voted TrainingToday® the “Best Workforce Training Solution.” Go here for more information or to sign up.
Danielle Bassett, Skirkanich Assistant Professor of Innovation in the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, is senior author on the study. Rather than looking at the role a single region in the brain plays, Bassett and her colleagues studied the interconnections between the regions as indicated by synchronized activity.
Using an MRI, they can measure which parts of the brain are “talking” to one another as study participants perform various tasks. Mapping the way this activity network reconfigures itself provides a more holistic view of how the brain operates.
“We try to understand how dynamic flexibility of brain networks can predict cognitive flexibility, or the ability to switch from task to task,” Bassett said. “Rather than being driven by the activity of single brain areas, we believe executive function is a network-level process.”
A previous study that Bassett led showed that people who could more quickly “disconnect” their frontal cortices did better on a task that involved pressing keys that corresponded to color-coded notes on a screen. The high-level decision making associated with the frontal cortex’s cognitive control wasn’t as critical to playing the short sequences of notes, so those who still engaged this part of the brain were essentially overthinking a simple problem.
No time to prepare or deliver training? With BLR’s TrainingToday®, your employees can start taking essential training courses the same day you sign up. Workers (and supervisors) train at their convenience, 24/7. We track and you save with this turnkey solution. Yes, it really can be this simple. Learn more.
In the new experiment, 344 participants alternated between a working memory task designed to engage the frontal cortex and a control task. The easy task involved pressing the corresponding button as a sequence of numbers appeared on a screen one by one. The hard task also involved a sequence of numbers on a screen, but participants had to press the button that corresponded to the number that appeared two places back in the series each time they saw a new number.
Bassett and the other lead researchers developed novel tools from network science to distill evolving brain connections. They used these tools to map how participants’ brain activities rearranged during each block of the working memory task, during each block of the control task, and during the blocks in between when participants switched gears.
“More flexibility within the frontal cortex meant more accuracy on the memory task, and more consistent connectivity between the frontal cortex and other regions was even more predictive,” Bassett explains.
While the predictive strength of this reconfiguration suggests that it is only one of several processes involved in successful task switching, it plays a core role.
“It doesn’t account for a huge amount variance,” Bassett said, “but it suggests that this kind of reconfiguration is a fundamental aspect of cognitive flexibility, which is vital to multitasking.”
Well there is multitasking and then there is multitasking. Taking a sip of water while during a walk observing the clouds and at the same time listening to birds is not multitasking. One thing at a time grasshopper. I would like to know some of their examples of multitasking.