Uncategorized

Independent Contractors: New Case Highlights Tax Risks of Misclassification

A new decision from a California Court of Appeals underscores how erroneously classifying workers as independent contractors rather than employees can have serious tax consequences.

The case involved a group of courier companies—collectively called Sonic—that classified delivery drivers as independent contractors and reported their pay on 1099 forms. The California Employment Development Department, however, decided that the drivers were employees and assessed Sonic $617,328 in employment taxes and penalties, plus interest. Sonic balked, contending that the drivers were properly classified as independent contractors.


Paying Overtime: 10 Key Exemption Concepts

Only one thing really matters in the determination as to whether or not an employee is exempt: The duties the employee performs. Learn how to avoid costly, preventable mistakes with our free White Paper, Paying Overtime: 10 Key Exemption Concepts.


But now an appeals court has upheld the assessment, finding sufficient evidence that Sonic had the right to control the drivers’ work, which is the key indicator of employee status. For example, the court noted, many Sonic drivers worked a regular schedule and drove regular daily routes, a fact that is consistent with employee status and reflects employer control. And the fact that Sonic didn’t exercise detailed supervision over the drivers didn’t undermine employee status, particularly because the simplicity of the work—take this package from point A to point B—made extensive supervision or control unnecessary.

We’ll have more on this case in an upcoming issue of the California Employer Advisor.

Additional Resources:

Air Couriers Int’l v. Employment Development Dept., Calif. Court of Appeals (Dist. 3) No. C050978, 2007

Employee or Independent Contractor? Hiring and Classifying Contract Workers in California

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *