HR Management & Compliance

Age Bias Becoming Battleground Issue for Employers

Earlier this month, a statewide class-action lawsuit was filed in a Northern California federal court, alleging that Minnesota-based giant 3M systematically discriminates against older employees. The lawsuit follows a similar case already pending in 3M’s home state.

In national headlines, the Washington Post, New York Times, and ABC News have all recently reported that workers at both ends of the age spectrum are becoming increasingly concerned that age is is a significant factor in employer decision-making.

Why has age suddenly been thrown into the spotlight?

Quite simply, it’s the economy. There are fewer jobs on the market, and employers everywhere have to make tough decisions about who to cut and who to keep.


How To Survive an Employee Lawsuit: 10 Tips for Success

With lawsuits against employers becoming ever more common—and jury verdicts skyrocketing—your risk of getting sued has increased dramatically even if you’ve done all the right things. Learn how to protect yourself with our free White Paper, How To Survive an Employee Lawsuit: 10 Tips for Success.


Recent graduates are competing with their more experienced counterparts for new jobs. Younger employees are usually willing to work for less, but they are also riskier hires. In a tight market where there are fewer jobs to go around, younger employees are skeptical that employers will be willing to give them a chance.

On the other hand, older workers worry that employers are looking for ways to get rid of them because they are generally the most expensive employees in terms of salaries and benefits. Older workers also feel stereotyped as being less capable of learning new technologies and adapting to rapidly changing business landscapes. According to the California lawsuit filed against 3M, older workers claim that the company disproportionately selected younger workers for intensive training and accelerated advancement programs, which resulted in fewer promotions and salary increases for employees over the age of 46.

While it’s too early to say how the 3M suit will turn out, one thing is clear: employers are going to have to be more careful than ever to steep clear of age bias traps, and ensure that their policies and practices don’t inadvertently lead to lawsuits.

We’ll have more about how to avoid age bias claims, and make sure your policies and practices are up to snuff, in a future issue of California Employer Advisor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *