Benefits and Compensation

Flex Arrangements—Outmoded Laws Are a Chokehold

Fortney is a co-founder of law firm Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, DC, and is editor of the Federal Employment Law Insider. He made his remarks about FWAs at SHRM’s Employment Law and Legislative Conference, held recently in the nation’s capitol.

What Are Flexible Workplace Arrangements?

First, says Fortney, here are the typical alternatives to traditional schedules and workplaces that comprise “flexible work arrangements” (FWA):

  • Flexible schedules
  • Compressed workweeks
  • Job sharing
  • Part-time work
  • Telecommuting

Why Are FWAs Important?

FWAs are particularly attractive because they serve three interests, says Fortney:

Employees’ interests

  • More flexibility with regard to family responsibilities
  • Less commuting time and costs

Employers’ interests

  • Increased productivity
  • Workforce retention
  • Continuation of operations during bad weather, natural disasters, etc.

Societal interests

  • Less traffic congestion
  • Reduced fuel consumption

What’s Driving the Flex Trend?

What’s driving the trend toward more flexible work environments? Workforce demographics are different in 21st century, says Fortney. Consider the following:

  • Women comprise nearly one-half of the labor force
  • In nearly one-half of households all adults are working
  • Dual-earner couples are the norm
  • There are more single-parent families
  • Many of the people in the workforce are caregivers for older people
  • More people with disabilities are working and are able to work because of FWA
  • Technology makes a lot possible that wasn’t possible just a few years ago

Finally, a simple but comprehensive guide to wage and hour. Correctly apply the FLSA, remain the go-to expert with BLR’s comprehensive guide. Save hours of research time.  Go here for information or to order Wage & Hour Compliance: Practical Solutions for HR.

Laws Are FWA’s Biggest Chokehold

Unfortunately, our laws were not designed with FWA in mind, says Fortney. They were designed for people who worked regularly scheduled hours at a particular place of work. The main laws that impact FWAs are:

Fair Labor Standards Act. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s rules can interfere with some attempts to arrange flex hours. For example:

  • For nonexempt employees, overtime required when working more than 40 hours in a workweek.
  • Off-the-clock issues (use of laptops, mobile phones).
  • Tasks like uploading data at the end of a day’s work or downloading the list of clients to visit can create issues—do they represent paid time?

One client, Fortney says, requires employees to turn in PDAs when leaving work, to be sure that no one uses them to do any work off hours.

National Labor Relations Act. The Act may impose a duty to bargain over FWAs.

Occupational Safety and Health Act.  OSHA wanted to control home offices, Fortney says, but they had to back off of that. Nevertheless, you have workers working in places you can’t supervise. Some employers do distribute specific rules for home offices, Fortney notes.

Family and Medical Leave Act. The FMLA may come into play, and the Americans with Disabilities Act/ADAAA could bring up questions about flex accommodations required.

State and local laws. Finally, state and local laws must be considered. For example, California has a daily overtime requirement makes difficulties for some flex programs.

Fixes to these mismatches between old laws and new workplace realities are not likely in the short term, says Fortney.

A Sampling of Research and Reports

One helpful thing is that there are lots of good resources out there, Fortney says. He recommends two reports in particular:

Wage and hour lawsuits are expensive—and easily prevented. Download your FREE report, FLSA Overtime: Making Your Way Through the Exempt/Nonexempt Minefield and you’ll also receive a 30-day trial to Wage and Hour Compliance. Download Now

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s National Initiative on Workplace Flexibility. This is lengthy report from the National Advisory Commission on Workplace Flexibility was issued May 2009. It identifies obstacles to FWAs and recommendations for removing those obstacles. You’ll have to tailor its information to your organization, Fortney says.

President’s Council of Economic Advisors Report on “Work-Life Balance and the Economics of Workplace Flexibility. Issued in March 2010, this is a thoughtful report on middle class issues, says Fortney, and a good resource if you need ammo to support your FWA initiatives. The report:

  • Analyzed current workforce demographics.
  • Examined current state of FWAs and employers’ adaptation to changing realities.
  • Discussed the economic benefits of FWAs.
    • Lower absenteeism and turnover
    • Increased productivity

In tomorrow’s Advisor, more on FWAs plus an introduction to a special program created just for smaller or even one-person HR departments.

2 thoughts on “Flex Arrangements—Outmoded Laws Are a Chokehold”

  1. You raise some good points. At first glance, flex work seems like a no-brainer (it certainly does for employees and often for managers/supervisors, too), but it really does raise some thorny legal issues. And the ability to work off-the-clock with technology today can have critical wage/hour implications even when a worker doesn’t have a formal flex work arrangement.

    1. I like to visit your blog because I learn very much about poahtgrophy when I read it. When the matter is about religion, I skipped it, usually. But this time I have to say something. I think many of you american people donb4t know what happen in the rest of the world. I don’t believe we europeans attend religious ceremonies, and I don’t think our children pray more at our schools that america children. But in Europe a tragedy like Columbine only took place when a man lose his mind and used all those arms he was able to collect. And what’s more, he used to say he was a good christian.In Europe people is not allowed to have firearms, so a man alone can’t murder ten persons at the same time. Only one person each time, perhaps two. Think of all the victims of Columbine that would be alive today, even if the murderer were the same one but he had no a firearm.A good christian should do whatever takes to avoid a murder. Demand the prohibition of the firearms, that are made only to kill (you will need firearms for nothing else that kill people). There are not so many bad people in USA, but they have too many firearms. Fire arms are not necessaries in Europe (England, France, Spain, Holland, Belgique ), and people in USA is not worse than Europe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *